News » or swing.As Axar Patel started getting some runs down th

LAUSANNE, Switzerland -- Russian hammer thrower Tatyana Lysenko was stripped of her gold medal from the 2012 London Olympics on Tuesday, the latest athlete sanctioned after being caught in the retesting of stored doping samples.Lysenko tested positive for the steroid turinabol and has been retroactively disqualified from the games, the International Olympic Committee said.The Russian Olympic Committee was ordered to secure the return of her gold medal as soon as possible.The gold now stands to go to second-place finisher Anita Wlodarczyk of Poland. It would be the second Olympic gold for Wlodarczyk, who won the hammer throw at the Rio de Janeiro Games in August.The IOC asked track and fields governing body, the IAAF, to modify the 2012 results and consider any further action against Lysenko, who retired last year. She could still face a lifetime ban for a second offense, as she was banned from 2007-09 for another doping violation.The IOC stores doping samples for 10 years to allow them to be retested when new methods become available.The IOC recorded a total of 98 positive cases in retests of samples from the London Olympics and 2008 Beijing Games. The new tests are capable of detecting traces of steroids going back weeks and months, rather than days.Lysenko, the world champion in 2011 and 2013, won the Olympic gold with a throw of 78.18 meters, followed by Wlodarczyk with 77.60. Germanys Betty Heidler could now move up from bronze to silver, with Chinas Zhang Wenxiu going from fourth place to bronze.In a seven-page decision, a three-man IOC disciplinary commission said Lysenko originally contested the positive test on grounds that a suspension she had served in the past was already unjustified.Lysenko told the IOC she was caring for a young child and had no time to defend herself. She did not attend the opening and testing of her backup B sample.Lysenko later wrote to the IOC that she had always been training conscientiously and did not understand why the reanalysis had shown positive results. She did not attend a disciplinary hearing in July.The IOC said Lysenko did not bring forward any relevant arguments or evidence to rebut the positive test and made no attempt to explain the source of turinabol, which the panel said is directly used as a performance-enhancing substance. Cheap Authentic Ultra Boost . - Blake Griffin had 30 points and 12 rebounds, J. Adidas Ultra Boost Sale . According to a report from the Winnipeg Free Press, the Bombers will name Acting GM Kyle Walters to the post full time. http://www.cheapauthenticultraboost.com/ . U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield in Manhattan agreed that lawyers on both sides could make their formal requests by Nov. 8. A hearing is scheduled for a day earlier. Jordan Siev, a lawyer for Rodriguez, wrote in a joint letter to the judge from lawyers on both sides that MLB lawyers planned to ask that the lawsuit be dismissed. Adidas Ultra Boost Clearance .ca looks back at the stories and moments that made the year memorable. Adidas Ultra Boost Clearance Sale . It says Pocklingtons lawyer filed the appeal Friday in a California court. CTV Edmonton also says Pocklington gave a $100,000 cash deposit as part of the conditions of his bail, and that he will be out on bail until his appeal is heard. By thrashing New Zealand in the decider, in Vizag, India thwarted criticism of their performance in the recent ODI series. They had, after all, lost two of the four matches until then.This touring New Zealand side was a weak team, and though India rested some key players, they should have done better in the ODIs - a fact, I am sure, not lost on the team management and selectors. More so given how India beat New Zealand 3-0 in the Test series.The team management and the selectors, essentially those in charge of the destiny of the Indian cricket team, must never think like the fans, who left happy seeing India win the series in grand style in Vizag.Bishan Bedi tweeted during the one-day series that the difference between the two sides was Virat Kohli. He was quite right. India in this series looked a bit like the India of the 90s, where it was basically about beating them by getting Tendulkar out early. Indian cricket has come a long way since then, and dependence on one man should not be allowed to take root. Its a sign of a weak team, which India are certainly not.MS Dhoni looked really good in Mohali when he got 80, showing that he is still a batting force in this one-day team. However, I am not a big fan of him at No. 4. People throw up his impressive numbers at four and make a case for him to bat there, but he has played at that position only a few times in his long career - not enough for those numbers to carry much weight.With the rule change in one-dayers, captains are now forced to keep five fielders inside the circle after ten overs until the 40th over. Dhoni at four will mostly bat in this phase, so he has to start his innings with five players inside the circle, all intent on saving singles. Dhoni has never been a batsman who easily taps the ball around and picks up four singles an over, like, say, Kohli does. Those are the kind of batsmen you need at that position, batsmen who are able to take singles at will, while hitting the odd boundary.To add to Dhonis problems, often he has to start his innings in this phase against spinners, and not seamers, against whom he gets going better, like in Mohali when he got that splendid 80. What then happens is that his strike rate for his first 30 runs is extremely low. He then backs himself to make up for the deficit later with his amazing ability to hit under pressure, but when this late surge does not materialise, he has about 40 off 80 balls.If Dhoni wants to bat at No. 4, he must be able to get his first 40 runs off at least 50 balls, so that, even if he gets out, the innings has not lost momentum. At No. 4 he also feels the added pressure of being more responsible and restrained, not looking to frequently hit the big shots to maintain a decent strike rate. For if he gets out doing so, he looks highly irresponsible - as opposed to doing the same at No. 6 or 7.I am told that under Gary Kirsten, India had a simple formula with Dhoni. He would bat when there were ten or 15 overs left in the innings, no matter how many wickets were lost at that stage. This makes a lot of sense, because batting in that situation is Dhonis USP, really. When the field is spread out and the adrenaline of both teams is running high, thats when Captain Cool really comes into his ownn.ddddddddddddAjinkya Rahane, despite his obvious class and value for India as a Test player, is not quite the same in one-dayers, which is surprising. When Kohli bats, you can see that he has a clear plan in his head about how to approach an ODI innings, which is mostly influenced by the teams needs. It seems Rahane cannot make up his mind whether he wants to be a dasher or an anchor at the top of the order. The thing is, Rahane has the ability to hit the big shots and also to use his hands to hit through the line and get boundaries off good balls. This ability actually adds to his confusion.Rahane has the skills to be an attacking one-day player, and also to be the glue that keeps Indias one-day innings together. The team management could perhaps assist him in resolving this conflict by telling him which Rahane they want in 50-overs cricket. Manish Pandey, on the other hand, was such a let-down for me. After that hundred in Sydney earlier this year, I had my eye on him to see how he develops as a one-day middle-order batsman. I thought this series was an excellent opportunity for him to cement his place in the side. Unfortunately he seems to be from the school of batting where players bat like they need 15 runs an over when the need is for only six an over. The bulk of a one-day innings is about scoring six an over, so is it worth investing in a young batsman who takes big risks to just get those six runs an over? Unless Pandey changes his ways, I dont think hes one for the future.Kedar Jadhav is an interesting player, and so multifaceted. He is a prolific first-class batsman, who on average has been scoring close to 500 runs per Ranji season. In the IPL he bats at No. 6 and successfully chases 12 runs an over, and whats more, keeps wicket too. Then he comes into this India-New Zealand one-day series and shows that he can bowl some decent offspinners as well.But is he a long-term prospect for India? My worry is that his fitness, while running between the wickets with the likes of Kohli, Dhoni, Rahane and Suresh Raina, might just fall short of the high standards set by them.For once Indias bowling overshadowed their batting in a one-day series at home. It was mainly the bowlers who were instrumental in India winning the series, with Hardik Pandya getting the Man-of-the-Match award in Dharamsala and Amit Mishra the Man of the Series.I wonder when the bowlers last held sway like this over an entire one-day series in India. Pandya for me was a revelation. From a bits-and-pieces cricketer he has suddenly become a seamer you can earmark to bowl ten overs. His batting is an added bonus.The brightest spot in the series, though, was Umesh Yadav, who seems to have finally found accuracy without sacrificing pace or swing.As Axar Patel started getting some runs down the order, he also got better as a bowler. Here is someone India can keep in their one-day plans - if not for anything, to push Ravindra Jadeja to be at his best.Who would have thought a review of a one-day series for India at home would end like this, where some batting issues need to be addressed, while the bowling seems fine? cheap falcons jerseys cheap ravens jerseys cheap bills jerseys cheap bears jerseys cheap bengals jerseys cheap cowboys jerseys cheap lions jerseys cheap texans jerseys cheap colts jerseys cheap jaguars jerseys cheap chiefs jerseys cheap rams jerseys cheap dolphins jerseys cheap vikings jerseys cheap saints jerseys cheap giants jerseys cheap jets jerseys cheap eagles jerseys cheap steelers jerseys cheap 49ers jerseys ' ' '